The well-being of non-human life on Earth has value in itself. Philosopher Arne Naess in 1973 coined the term ‘deep ecology’ for similar sentiments, later articulating the notion in Principle 1 of the Deep Ecology Platform: Ecologist Aldo Leopold in Sand County Almanac wrote the classic evocation of ecocentrism in ‘The Land Ethic’, which expanded the ‘community’ to include animals, plants and the land itself. Many indigenous cultures around the world speak of lore and (in Australia) ‘law’ that reflects an ecocentric view of the world. Historical roots of ecocentrismĮcocentrism as a worldview has been with humanity since we evolved. Given that life relies on geological processes and geomorphology to sustain it, and that ‘geodiversity’ also has intrinsic value, the broader term ‘ecocentrism’ seems most appropriate. Ecocentrism is thus the umbrella that includes biocentrism and zoocentrism, because all three of these worldviews value the nonhuman, with ecocentrism having the widest vision. It also goes beyond zoocentrism (seeing value in animals) on account of explicitly including flora and the ecological contexts for organisms. Ecocentrism goes beyond biocentrism (ethics that sees inherent value to all living things) by including environmental systems as wholes, and their abiotic aspects. Ecocentrism is the broadest of worldviews, but there are related worldviews. It takes a much wider view of the world than does anthropocentrism, which sees individual humans and the human species as more valuable than all other organisms. What is ecocentrism?Įcocentrism finds inherent (intrinsic) value in all of nature.

Changing our worldview to ecocentrism however offers hope for solving the environmental crisis.

The traditional, post-enlightenment Western anthropocentric worldview has failed to halt this (and is almost certainly responsible for it). The Earth’s biodiversity and ecological integrity is being lost at an ever-increasing rate due to human impacts.

Eco global survival game key